The famend Princeton College well being economist Uwe Reinhardt died right now. The e-mail from his Dean on the Woodrow Wilson college stated he handed peacefully and surrounded by household.
Reactions on Twitter resonate with my very own. They replicate Uwe’s contributions to and presence in well being care coverage and training — “insightful, “a treasure,” centered on the “ethical underpinnings of coverage,” “one of many nicest and funniest individuals within the discipline of well being econ,” “a godfather of well being coverage and economics,” “a singular and disarmingly highly effective voice in well being coverage,” a “world-class mensch,” “a gifted instructor and galvanizing chief,” one of many “most acerbic audio system in Well being Care during the last 20+ years. By no means afraid to talk fact to energy,” “partaking and comprehensible,” “an enormous.”
I as soon as known as him “the narrator of U.S. well being care coverage.” Any journalist who might pay money for him for a well being care story was certain to get pure gold. His wit and precision had been evident in his spoken and written phrase. His command of English was super. His capability to clarify to put audiences, legendary. When you’re unfamiliar, go learn something he wrote for The New York Instances Economix weblog, the place he posted recurrently for years. He can train. You’ll study.
Born and raised in Germany, he did all of it in a second language. Of this, he reminded audiences recurrently. The title of one in every of his displays was, “Nonetheless Confused, After 40 Years in America!” Don’t consider it. Uwe was all the time the least confused particular person within the room.
He opened many speeches with, “I’m simply an immigrant so possibly I’m lacking one thing in regards to the curious American well being care system” (or comparable). I heard it many occasions. It by no means received outdated, significantly as a result of I knew what was coming subsequent. Simply after such a gap, he would reveal some peculiarity of the well being system I had by no means seen in the identical method. After which he proceeded to indicate the way it was illogical, in violation of fundamental ideas of economics, immoral, or hypocritical.
He was a knife tornado of the primary class. Must you maintain dearly an thought he focused for systematic dismantling, you’ll squirm. If solely I might write half as properly or suppose one-third as clearly.
He touched so many lives and careers, together with my very own.
My first engagement with Uwe was in 2009, over one in every of his Economix posts. Within the feedback to that publish, I requested him for an economics argument in favor of a public possibility. He was sort sufficient to reply at size on to my inquiry in a follow-up Economix publish. I used to be thrilled, at the same time as I took a beating. I documented the encounter on this weblog.
Maybe resulting from my repeated blog-based engagement with him — like a fly that simply received’t go away — Uwe took some curiosity in what I used to be doing on TIE. He seen my many posts on hospital price shifting and steered that an up to date literature evaluation ought to be revealed. I counter-offered that we do it collectively, and he accepted.
I knew precisely what this meant. I used to be to put in writing the primary draft and he would function senior writer and inform me how way more work it wanted. Right here’s the place Uwe shocked me and earned my deepest respect. His response to my first draft was that it was so good he didn’t suppose it proper that his identify seem on it. As a substitute, I ought to publish it solo, together with his help. That is good mentorship. It was my first solo-authored paper and is my most cited publication.
I met Uwe in particular person solely as soon as, in Princeton in 2010. I used to be there to go to my dad and mom and provides a chat on the Woodrow Wilson College. Studying I’d be on the town, he invited me to lunch. I believed it was simply going to be the 2 of us, however he insisted I deliver my dad and mom too — his deal with. (Upfront of the lunch, with some assist from YouTube, I practiced how one can pronounce his identify. It’s “oo-va” not “you-ee.”)
Although I by no means noticed him once more in particular person, for years I encountered him over e mail. Normally our threads started with me asking a query or him sharing one in every of his prolonged emails to another scholar or policymaker. (Oh, what a disgrace it’s he didn’t publish these emails for all to see. They had been gems.) However incessantly he would e mail out of the blue to inquire about my household. He took an curiosity in listening to what my youngsters had been as much as and used that as a chance to remind me how totally different parenting or childhood was in his day.
“Baby rearing is so totally different these days,” he wrote me as soon as. “Once we had been little, we left the home after lunch and got here house for supper, roaming the nation facet within the meantime (and enjoying with reside ammunition [left over from WW II]).” I’ve only a few folders of saved emails, however this one and others of his I filed away, to not be deleted.
Incessantly, within the e mail back-and-forth that ensued he would sort out some superb story of previous hijinks. Right here’s one:
As soon as, at a Duke College non-public sector convention, your complete brass of the AMA occurred to be there. It was my flip on the podium and I couldn’t resist the next stunt.
The late James Sammons, then head of the AMA, had given interview by which he stated Congress had carved Medicare to demise like a turkey. I confirmed a slide of that quote which occurred to have his image subsequent to it. I then confirmed information based on which between 1980 and 1988 constant-dollar Medicare spending on doctor providers per beneficiary rose 83%. Apologizing for this low quantity on behalf of taxpayers (the expansion of 83% actual allegedly didn’t allow physicians to present the aged enough care), I requested the AMA individuals: “What improve would have been enough in your view?” So I counted out numbers (on a slide) like an auctioneer – 100%, 120% , …– however by no means received any takers. After +160% I left a clean spot and stated: “Evidently 160% wouldn’t do it, so that you give me the quantity. Is it 300%?” Icy silence. I then had a slide quoting country-music singer Conway Twitty or whoever it was from his track: “I would like extra of you (moolah) – extra, something much less wouldn’t do.”
I then I ended saying that Karen Davis and I, each then serving on the PPRC (now Medpac) would suggest a funds for Medicare doctor fee (the VPS), as a result of the docs wouldn’t come to the desk with an affordable quantity.
For some time I actually was banned on the AMA; however later I ended up on the JAMA board.
With tales like this, I considered him because the Richard Feynman of well being coverage — sensible in his discipline however with an urge for food for journey and sensible jokes. I inspired him many occasions to put in writing up tales like these in a ebook, interwoven with well being coverage evaluation or historical past. Sadly, he by no means did. Although he took delight in his previous escapades, maybe he noticed himself in a different way late in his profession.
“After I was youthful I used to be extra brash,” Uwe wrote me. “Now I’ve mellowed.”
There are numerous giants in academia, and lots of in well being care. However there are none I do know like Uwe.
